La memoria viva de la calle: impactos sociales, culturales y políticos en Chile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo argumenta que existe en Chile un proceso específi co de cons-trucción social de la memoria, que, en un contexto institucional adverso, no solo ema-na de las agrupaciones especializadas, sino que también de una apropiación social de los temas de la memoria y de los derechos humanos por parte de diversos movimientos sociales. Mediante un análisis plurisemiótico del discurso, realizado a partir de un ma-terial de consignas de manifestaciones y entrevistas a defensores de derechos humanos, se analizan diferentes ejes de construcción social de la memoria, cuya expresión pública –en las calles– culmina con el estallido de 2019. Este análisis permite demostrar que la construcción social de memoria en Chile debe ser califi cada como contrahegemónica por su cuestionamiento al modelo chileno postdictatorial en su conjunto, al provocar un cambio de la lengua política característica de la postdictadura y su narrativa de acusación a las víctimas, la cual asociaba el conflicto social a la ruptura democrática y defendía la amnistía como condición de la reconciliación y de la estabilidad del llama-do modelo chileno.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".