MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396793169 · doi:10.3828/shandean.2020.31.07

Grubstreet Icarus: Staples Steare, Book-Trade Opportunism, and Sterne

2020· article· en· W4396793169 on OpenAlexaff
Austin Long

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Shandean. · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultidisciplinary Warburg-centric Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsICARUSOpportunismEconomicsPhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The full text of the second pamphlet response to the death of Laurence Sterne is here introduced, transcribed, and annotated. The introduction features a biography of the obscure but fascinating bookseller behind the pamphlet, Staples Steare, whose career as a publisher of radical Wilkite materials briefly soared in 1768 before ending in disaster. This essay proposes some connections between Steare’s provocative political activities and his opportunistic Sterne publication, and opens up critical avenues for reading the text.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Shandean.Same topicMultidisciplinary Warburg-centric StudiesFrench-language works237,207