Enhancing Energy Efficiency in Telehealth IoT through MultiObjective Optimization on a Hybrid Fog/Cloud Computing Platform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving field of Telehealth Internet of Things (IoT), the pursuit of energy-efficient solutions that coexist with optimal system performance is a critical concern. This paper introduces a novel approach to address this challenge by integrating multi-objective optimization techniques within a hybrid fog/ cloud computing platform. Building upon established research on a fog-based telehealth model, this study extends its investigation to encompass a broader spectrum of performance metrics, including energy efficiency, response time, throughput, and resource utilization. The study employs well-established multiobjective optimization algorithms, specifically NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II) and SPEA2 (Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2), to construct a comprehensive optimization framework. An intricate objective function is meticulously formulated to quantify the trade-offs between energy efficiency and other key performance metrics, facilitating the identification of Pareto-optimal solutions. The resulting Pareto front offers illuminating insights into the nuanced interplay between energy efficiency and performance attributes, providing decision-makers with tailored options that cater to their specific priorities. Rigorous evaluation of these solutions through simulated experiments reveals a harmonious landscape where energy-saving imperatives coalesce harmoniously with response time, throughput, and resource utilization goals. The implications of this multi-objective optimization approach are analyzed in depth, underscoring its potential to reshape optimization paradigms for Telehealth IoT deployments within a fog/cloud hybrid platform. This research represents a pioneering stride towards reconciling energy efficiency and performance in Telehealth IoT systems, offering a nuanced perspective for informed decision-making and a sustainable future for energy-saving initiatives in Telehealth IoT applications
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".