Roman Marital Ideals and Aurelia Philematium: Casta, Pudens … Married at Seven?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Based on her epitaph, Aurelia Philematium is viewed as an exemplar of Roman marital ideals. A close examination of the relief and analysis of the monument within a larger sample of inscriptions reveal elements that belie this portrayal. This article argues that the depiction of Philematium and its disproportionate influence on scholarly perception of Roman marital ideals need to be reexamined. Réesumé: D'après son épitaphe, Aurelia Philematium est vue comme un exemple de l'idéal conjugal romain. En réalisant un examen poussé du bas-relief et en replaçant le monument dans un ensemble plus large d'inscriptions, l'on dévoile certains éléments qui démentent cette caractérisation. Cet article soutient que la description de Philematium et son influence disproportionnée sur la manière dont les chercheurs perçoivent l'idéal conjugal romain doivent être réévaluées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it