MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396802336 · doi:10.1353/phx.2023.a926372

Slavery and Sexuality in Classical Antiquity ed. by Deborah Kamen and C. W. Marshall (review)

2023· article· en· W4396802336 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Sutton

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoenix · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman sexualityHistoryArtSociologyGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Slavery and Sexuality in Classical Antiquity ed. by Deborah Kamen and C. W. Marshall David Sutton Slavery and Sexuality in Classical Antiquity. Edited by Deborah Kamen and C. W. Marshall. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. 2021. Pp. 317. While research into many aspects of marginalized identity and experience is a rich part of classical scholarship and teaching today, genuinely intersectional approaches remain in many ways novel to the field. Thus, volumes like Slavery and Sexuality in Classical Antiquity have much to offer both in their own right and as signposts for further developments in ancient studies. This collection of essays explores the role of sex in the lives of enslaved people in Mediterranean antiquity, mostly addressing textual sources and largely setting aside the context of prostitution, which, the editors note, is the most fully treated aspect of slave sexuality today. The sensitive introduction acknowledges the principal challenges to their project, including the limitations of the primary evidence and the fundamental problem of balancing a vigilant awareness of the oppressive nature of slavery against recovering a role for subjectivity and agency among enslaved individuals [End Page 168] and populations. With respect to the limitations of ancient evidence the editors highlight the utility of comparison with modern slave societies where the enslaved voice is better preserved, and a number of the contributors to the volume take this opportunity very much in hand (principally, but not exclusively, with reference to the American context). There are seven chapters on Greek topics followed by six on Rome, and some of them form thematic clusters; three chapters from the second half treat evidence from the Roman novel, while two chapters from the first half (and large parts of two more) address Greek oratory. These focus areas mean that potential paths of inquiry are not taken up, with little attention paid to comedy or epigram (for example), but this is a natural enough occurrence when new ground is being broken and should merely serve as a stimulus to further study. Two chapters on material culture, on classical Greek art and Pompeian households respectively, provide extremely valuable context to the textual evidence explored elsewhere and readers will profit from these as they explore other sections of the book. Emily Wilson begins with a study of slave sexuality in Homeric epic, focused mostly on the Odyssey and its depictions of enslaved women, which argues for an emphasis on the vulnerability to sexual abuse of mortal women for whom rape is understood as a normal component of enslavement. This approach culminates in a reading of Telemachus' execution of the enslaved women that rejects interpretations of the act as punishment for any exercise of sexual agency on their part. Kathy L. Gaca offers a provocative study of martial rape in antiquity with modern comparative evidence from multiple nineteenth-to twenty-first-century conflicts, an approach that is fruitfully applied to the story of the "Olynthian woman" in Dem. 19.196–198 (also the topic of Allison Glazebrook's Chapter Seven). The chapter's central claim is that the female head of a slave-owning household exercised control over the male slave-owner's sexual access to female slaves in the home; this proves one of the more speculative arguments in the book with modern comparative evidence rather more compelling than the ancient material. Kelly L. Wrenhaven's chapter offers a valuable and unflinching overview of the representation of vulnerability, abuse, and sexualized violence towards enslaved bodies in the material cultural tradition. While enslaved males are not subject to the same levels of violence as females, the eroticized sexual use of male bodies is also demonstrated, and the chapter reviews somatic distinction both between free and enslaved bodies and between different categories of slaves. To my mind one of the most successful sequences in the book is formed by the Athenian section. Chapters Four and Five, by Jason Douglas Porter and Rafał Matuszewski, respectively, are closely linked in their focus on sexual agency of and sexual relationships involving enslaved people in classical Athens. Porter directs attention to heteroerotic pairings and Matuszewski to homoerotic ones, both arguing for a recognition of the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhoenixSame topicAfrican Sexualities and LGBTQ+ IssuesFrench-language works237,207