MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396802361 · doi:10.1353/phx.2023.a926361

Non Secus in Iugis : Horace Reads Euripides' Bacchae

2023· article· fr· W4396802361 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Justina Gregory

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoenix · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtLiteraturePhilosophyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: In Odes 3.25 Horace draws on Euripides' Bacchae as an intertext to strengthen the poem's associative links. Through intertextuality, Horace implicitly contrasts the resistance of Euripides' Pentheus to Dionysus' divinity with his own celebration of Augustus' apotheosis, while salient details bring the poem's representation of the god into sharper focus. Réesumé: Dans Odes 3.25, Horace s'inspire des Bacchantes d'Euripide afin de renforcer les diverses associations établies par le poème. Jouant de l'intertextualité, Horace oppose implicitement la résistance du Penthée d'Euripide envers la divinité de Dionysos à sa propre célébration de l'apothéose d'Auguste, tandis que certains détails donnent davantage de relief à la représentation du dieu dans le poème.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhoenixSame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207