MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396807348 · doi:10.5267/j.esm.2024.1.006

Using the method of differential equations by quadratic to solve the free vibrations of columns under the effect of axial load and column weight

2024· article· en· W4396807348 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amir Nadi, Mohammadreza Moradi, Farzaneh Tahmoorian, Peyman Beiranvand

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Solid Mechanics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVibrationColumn (typography)Quadratic equationDifferential (mechanical device)Materials scienceDifferential equationStructural engineeringMechanicsMathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisEngineeringGeometryAcousticsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates various techniques used to solve the differential equations governing the free vibration of columns. The present work focuses on the study of the free vibration of Euler’s Bernoulli column of equal strength in compression, considering its own weight and the axial load in compression and tension while subjected to symmetrical boundary conditions. The investigation utilizes the differential quadrature method to examine the fifth natural frequency parameters of the column in different states of column boundary conditions and varying geometric section shapes, including pin-pin and clamp-clamp configurations. The results of this work contribute valuable insights for informed decisions on selecting the cross-section types and appropriate boundary conditions for ensuring the stability of such columns in civil constructions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering Solid MechanicsSame topicComposite Structure Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207