MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396814370 · doi:10.1017/fms.2025.10095

Two uniqueness results in the inverse boundary value problem for the weighted <i>p</i> -Laplace equation

2025· preprint· en· W4396814370 on OpenAlexaff
Cătălin I. Cârstea, Ali Feizmohammadi

Bibliographic record

VenueForum of Mathematics Sigma · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods in inverse problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Science and Technology Council
KeywordsUniquenessLaplace transformMathematicsBoundary value problemLaplace's equationInverseMathematical analysisInverse Laplace transformBoundary valuesUniqueness theorem for Poisson's equationValue (mathematics)Inverse problemGreen's function for the three-variable Laplace equationApplied mathematicsStatisticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper we prove a general uniqueness result in the inverse boundary value problem for the weighted p -Laplace equation in the plane, with smooth weights. We also prove a uniqueness result in dimension 3 and higher, for real analytic weights that are subject to a smallness condition on one of their directional derivatives. Both results are obtained by linearizing the equation at a solution without critical points. This unknown solution is then recovered, together with the unknown weight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForum of Mathematics SigmaSame topicNumerical methods in inverse problemsFrench-language works237,207