MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Current Bibliography

2023· article· en· W4396817889 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexis Grainger

Bibliographic record

VenueNathaniel Hawthorne Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFreedom of Expression and Defamation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBibliographyLibrary scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grainger, Alexis. “Annual Hawthorne Bibliography.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 1, 2022, pp. 99–116.Roggenkamp, Karen. “Hawthorne.” American Literary Scholarship: An Annual 2020, edited by David J. Nordloh, Duke UP, 2022, pp. 27–36.Colacurcio, Michael J. Hawthorne’s Histories, Hawthorne’s World: From Salem to Somewhere Else. Anthem Press, 2022.Medoro, Dana. Certain Concealments: Poe, Hawthorne, and Early Nineteenth-Century Abortion. U of Massachusetts P, 2022.Salwak, Dale. Life of the Author: Nathaniel Hawthorne. Wiley-Blackwell, 2022.Clawson, AnaMaria Seglie. “The Marble Faun in a Secular Age.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 2, 2022, pp. 130–50.Cook, Jonathan A. “Christian Moralism in The House of the Seven Gables.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 1, 2022, pp. 1–27.Cook, Jonathan A., et al. “Germinous Seeds: Hawthorne’s Creative Influence on Melville.” Leviathan, vol. 24, no. 3, October 2022, pp. 7–49.Crawford, Benjamin. “Visible Saints and Sinners: Witnesses and Spiritual Uncertainty in ‘Young Goodman Brown.’” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 2, 2022, pp. 175–94.Darbandi, Ali Hassanpour, and Tahereh Rezaei. “Hawthorne’s New Pilgrim’s Progress and Antebellum America: Subversion and Containment in ‘The Celestial Railroad.’” Neophilologus, vol. 106, 2022, pp. 147–65.Dawson, Jon. “William Molyneux’s Problem and Nathaniel Hawthorne’s ‘My Kinsman, Major Molineux.’” Studies in the American Short Story, vol. 3, nos. 1–2, 2022, pp. 1–17.Dow, Keith. “‘Marked’ Bodies, Medical Intervention, and Courageous Humility: Spiritual Identity Formation in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s ‘The Birthmark.’” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 625–37.Fredner, Erik. “A Meaning Apart from Its Indistinguishable Words.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 1, 2022, pp. 82–98.Gee, Sam. “‘A Gesture and a Pose’: Hawthorne, Eliot, and the Aesthetics of Detachment.” Literary Imagination, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–19.Groff, Martin J. “‘To Continue Their Illustrious Breed’: Aristocracy, Democracy, and the Search for Dignity in The House of the Seven Gables.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 47, no. 2, 2021, pp. 187–209.Helm, Matthew Joseph. “Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Reframing of That ‘Which Milton Tells About’: Literary Influence and Blithedale’s Queer Masque.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 47, no. 2, 2021, pp. 250–66.Manzanetti, Evan. “A Somewhat Wilder Grace: Hawthorne, Humboldt, and Withstanding the Collapse of Nature into Symbol in The House of the Seven Gables.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 47, no. 2, 2021, pp. 210–30.Martin, Michael S. “‘A Deeper and More Conscious Silence’: Aurality in Thoreau and Hawthorne’s Journals and Later Works.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 47, no. 2, 2021, pp. 267–90.Murray, Hannah Lauren. “‘A Respectable Narrative’: The Viral Load in ‘Mr. Higginbotham’s Catastrophe.’” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 1, 2022, pp. 50–66.Oatis, Amy. “‘The Safe Secrecy of the Confessional’: Catholic Sacra-mentals and Performativity in Hawthorne’s Writings.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 2, 2022, pp. 151–74.Rattner, Ashley. “‘No Such Faery Land, So Like the Real World’: Miles Coverdale’s Performance of the Utopian Spectacle.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 47, no. 2, 2021, pp. 231–49.Reznick, Scott M. “Hawthorne, History, and Politics: A Reassessment.” Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory, vol. 78, no. 1, Spring 2022, pp. 105–32.Scruton, CJ. “‘A Kind of Privilege to Haunt’: Settler Structures, Land-Based Knowledge, and the Agency of the (Super)Natural in The House of the Seven Gables.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 1, 2022, pp. 28–49.Sweet, Nancy. “‘Man Needs It So’: Roman Catholicism in The Blithedale Romance.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 2, 2022, pp. 195–217.Temple, Gale. “The Hermeneutics of Implication and Inference: Actor-Network Theory, The Scarlet Letter, and the Hawthorne Digital Archive.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 1, 2022, pp. 67–81.Williams, Susan S. “Revising The Scarlet Letter: Race and Motherhood in In the Blood and Little Fires Everywhere.” Adaptations, vol. 15, no. 1, 2022, pp. 51–67.Dabling, Brandon. “Free Love and Marital Love: John Humphrey Noyes and Nathaniel Hawthorne.” A New Birth of Marriage: Love, Politics, and the Vision of the Founders, U of Notre Dame P, 2022, pp. 167–89.Frank, Catherine O. “Incriminating Character: Revisiting the Right to Silence in Adam Bede and The Scarlet Letter.” Character, Writing, and Reputation in Victorian Law and Literature, Edinburgh UP, 2021, pp. 31–82.Mueller, Stephanie. “Satanic Corporate Agents in the Marketplace: Hawthorne, Melville, De Forest and the Uses of Allegory.” The Corporation in the Nineteenth-Century American Imagination, Edinburgh UP, 2022, pp. 75–106.Sachs, Aaron. “A Bosom Friend (1850–1851).” Up from the Depths: Herman Melville, Lewis Mumford, and Rediscovery in Dark Times, Princeton UP, 2022, pp. 52–61.Solecki, Sam. “Etruscans in America: Ralph Waldo Emerson’s Dream (1862), Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Marble Faun (1860), and Emily Dickinson’s Etruscan Triptych.” Etruscans in the Modern Imagination, McGill-Queen’s UP, 2022, pp. 119–36.Dunne, Gregory. “Poetics of Ruins: Matsuo Bashō and Nathaniel Hawthorne, a Comparative Study.” Imperfectionist Aesthetics in Art and Everyday Life, edited by Peter Cheyne, Routledge, 2022, pp. 158–71.Levine, Robert S. “Gothic Reconstruction: Hawthorne’s House in Tourgée’s Toinette and A Royal Gentleman.” Reimagining the Republic: Race, Citizenship, Nation, in the Literary Work of Albion W. Tourgée, edited by Sandra M. Gustafson and Robert S. Levine, Fordham UP, 2022, pp. 19–31.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.011
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6180.579

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNathaniel Hawthorne ReviewSame topicFreedom of Expression and DefamationFrench-language works237,207