Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Grainger, Alexis. “Annual Hawthorne Bibliography.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 1, 2022, pp. 99–116.Roggenkamp, Karen. “Hawthorne.” American Literary Scholarship: An Annual 2020, edited by David J. Nordloh, Duke UP, 2022, pp. 27–36.Colacurcio, Michael J. Hawthorne’s Histories, Hawthorne’s World: From Salem to Somewhere Else. Anthem Press, 2022.Medoro, Dana. Certain Concealments: Poe, Hawthorne, and Early Nineteenth-Century Abortion. U of Massachusetts P, 2022.Salwak, Dale. Life of the Author: Nathaniel Hawthorne. Wiley-Blackwell, 2022.Clawson, AnaMaria Seglie. “The Marble Faun in a Secular Age.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 2, 2022, pp. 130–50.Cook, Jonathan A. “Christian Moralism in The House of the Seven Gables.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 1, 2022, pp. 1–27.Cook, Jonathan A., et al. “Germinous Seeds: Hawthorne’s Creative Influence on Melville.” Leviathan, vol. 24, no. 3, October 2022, pp. 7–49.Crawford, Benjamin. “Visible Saints and Sinners: Witnesses and Spiritual Uncertainty in ‘Young Goodman Brown.’” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 2, 2022, pp. 175–94.Darbandi, Ali Hassanpour, and Tahereh Rezaei. “Hawthorne’s New Pilgrim’s Progress and Antebellum America: Subversion and Containment in ‘The Celestial Railroad.’” Neophilologus, vol. 106, 2022, pp. 147–65.Dawson, Jon. “William Molyneux’s Problem and Nathaniel Hawthorne’s ‘My Kinsman, Major Molineux.’” Studies in the American Short Story, vol. 3, nos. 1–2, 2022, pp. 1–17.Dow, Keith. “‘Marked’ Bodies, Medical Intervention, and Courageous Humility: Spiritual Identity Formation in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s ‘The Birthmark.’” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 625–37.Fredner, Erik. “A Meaning Apart from Its Indistinguishable Words.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 1, 2022, pp. 82–98.Gee, Sam. “‘A Gesture and a Pose’: Hawthorne, Eliot, and the Aesthetics of Detachment.” Literary Imagination, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–19.Groff, Martin J. “‘To Continue Their Illustrious Breed’: Aristocracy, Democracy, and the Search for Dignity in The House of the Seven Gables.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 47, no. 2, 2021, pp. 187–209.Helm, Matthew Joseph. “Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Reframing of That ‘Which Milton Tells About’: Literary Influence and Blithedale’s Queer Masque.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 47, no. 2, 2021, pp. 250–66.Manzanetti, Evan. “A Somewhat Wilder Grace: Hawthorne, Humboldt, and Withstanding the Collapse of Nature into Symbol in The House of the Seven Gables.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 47, no. 2, 2021, pp. 210–30.Martin, Michael S. “‘A Deeper and More Conscious Silence’: Aurality in Thoreau and Hawthorne’s Journals and Later Works.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 47, no. 2, 2021, pp. 267–90.Murray, Hannah Lauren. “‘A Respectable Narrative’: The Viral Load in ‘Mr. Higginbotham’s Catastrophe.’” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 1, 2022, pp. 50–66.Oatis, Amy. “‘The Safe Secrecy of the Confessional’: Catholic Sacra-mentals and Performativity in Hawthorne’s Writings.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 2, 2022, pp. 151–74.Rattner, Ashley. “‘No Such Faery Land, So Like the Real World’: Miles Coverdale’s Performance of the Utopian Spectacle.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 47, no. 2, 2021, pp. 231–49.Reznick, Scott M. “Hawthorne, History, and Politics: A Reassessment.” Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory, vol. 78, no. 1, Spring 2022, pp. 105–32.Scruton, CJ. “‘A Kind of Privilege to Haunt’: Settler Structures, Land-Based Knowledge, and the Agency of the (Super)Natural in The House of the Seven Gables.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 1, 2022, pp. 28–49.Sweet, Nancy. “‘Man Needs It So’: Roman Catholicism in The Blithedale Romance.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 2, 2022, pp. 195–217.Temple, Gale. “The Hermeneutics of Implication and Inference: Actor-Network Theory, The Scarlet Letter, and the Hawthorne Digital Archive.” Nathaniel Hawthorne Review, vol. 48, no. 1, 2022, pp. 67–81.Williams, Susan S. “Revising The Scarlet Letter: Race and Motherhood in In the Blood and Little Fires Everywhere.” Adaptations, vol. 15, no. 1, 2022, pp. 51–67.Dabling, Brandon. “Free Love and Marital Love: John Humphrey Noyes and Nathaniel Hawthorne.” A New Birth of Marriage: Love, Politics, and the Vision of the Founders, U of Notre Dame P, 2022, pp. 167–89.Frank, Catherine O. “Incriminating Character: Revisiting the Right to Silence in Adam Bede and The Scarlet Letter.” Character, Writing, and Reputation in Victorian Law and Literature, Edinburgh UP, 2021, pp. 31–82.Mueller, Stephanie. “Satanic Corporate Agents in the Marketplace: Hawthorne, Melville, De Forest and the Uses of Allegory.” The Corporation in the Nineteenth-Century American Imagination, Edinburgh UP, 2022, pp. 75–106.Sachs, Aaron. “A Bosom Friend (1850–1851).” Up from the Depths: Herman Melville, Lewis Mumford, and Rediscovery in Dark Times, Princeton UP, 2022, pp. 52–61.Solecki, Sam. “Etruscans in America: Ralph Waldo Emerson’s Dream (1862), Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Marble Faun (1860), and Emily Dickinson’s Etruscan Triptych.” Etruscans in the Modern Imagination, McGill-Queen’s UP, 2022, pp. 119–36.Dunne, Gregory. “Poetics of Ruins: Matsuo Bashō and Nathaniel Hawthorne, a Comparative Study.” Imperfectionist Aesthetics in Art and Everyday Life, edited by Peter Cheyne, Routledge, 2022, pp. 158–71.Levine, Robert S. “Gothic Reconstruction: Hawthorne’s House in Tourgée’s Toinette and A Royal Gentleman.” Reimagining the Republic: Race, Citizenship, Nation, in the Literary Work of Albion W. Tourgée, edited by Sandra M. Gustafson and Robert S. Levine, Fordham UP, 2022, pp. 19–31.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,016 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle