MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hybrid Intervals and Symbolic Block Matrices

2023· article· en· W4396817943 on OpenAlexaff
Mike Ghesquiere, Stephen M. Watt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSymbolic data analysisBlock (permutation group theory)Matrix multiplicationSymbolic computationSymbolic trajectory evaluationThe SymbolicMatrix (chemical analysis)Computer scienceAlgebra over a fieldTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsArithmeticAlgorithmPure mathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structured matrices with symbolic sizes appear frequently in the literature, especially in the description of algorithms for linear algebra. Recent work has treated these symbolic structured matrices themselves as computational objects, showing how to add matrices with blocks of different symbolic sizes in a general way while avoiding a combinatorial explosion of cases. The present article introduces the concept of hybrid intervals, in which points may have negative multiplicity. Various operations on hybrid intervals have compact and elegant formulations that do not require cases to handle different orders of the end points. This makes them useful to represent symbolic block matrix structures and to express arithmetic on symbolic block matrices compactly. We use these ideas to formulate symbolic block matrix addition and multiplication in a compact and uniform way.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207