Semiclassical perspective on Landau levels and Hall conductivity in an anisotropic cubic Dirac semimetal and the peculiar case of star-shaped classical orbits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study an anisotropic cubic Dirac semimetal subjected to a constant magnetic field. In the case of an isotropic dispersion in the x − y plane, with parameters v x = v y , it is possible to find exact Landau levels, indexed by the quantum number n , using the typical ladder operator approach. Interestingly, we find that the lowest energy level (the zero-energy state in the case of k z = 0 ) has a degeneracy that is 3 times that of other states. This degeneracy manifests in the Hall conductivity as a step at a zero chemical potential 3/2 the size of other steps. Moreover, as n → ∞ , we find energies E n ∝ n 3 / 2 , which means the n th step as a function of the chemical potential roughly occurs at a value μ ∝ n 3 / 2 . We propose that these exciting features could be used to experimentally identify cubic Dirac semimetals. Subsequently, we analyze the anisotropic case v y = λ v x , with λ ≠ 1 . First, we consider a perturbative treatment around λ ≈ 1 and find that energies E n ∝ n 3 / 2 still hold as n → ∞ . To gain further insight into the Landau level structure for a maximum anisotropy, we turn to a semiclassical treatment that reveals interesting star-shaped orbits in phase space that close at infinity. This property is a manifestation of weakly localized states. Despite being infinite in length, these orbits enclose a finite phase space volume and permit finding a simple semiclassical formula for the energy, which has the same form as above. Our findings suggest that both isotropic and anisotropic cubic Dirac semimetals should leave similar experimental imprints. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".