Crop Height Estimation Based on a Novel Semi-Empirical Model Considering Double-Bounce Scattering Using RADARSAT-2 PolSAR Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Obtaining precise and rapid crop height is essential to facilitate agricultural production services, field management, disaster monitoring, and yield assessment. With the capability to penetrate vegetation and record vertical structure information, Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar (PolSAR) holds significant potential for application in vegetation height inversion. The Water Cloud Model (WCM) and its enhanced versions are extensively utilized for estimating crop heights from PolSAR data owing to their physical significance and simplicity. However, the method is not practical for stalk crops due to the neglect of double-bounce scattering considerations. Therefore, according to the growth characteristics of stalk crops, a three-component polarimetric coherent backscattering model considering crop target double-bounce scattering is established by simplifying the Random Volume over Ground (RVoG) coherent scattering model. The empirical coefficient is introduced to simplify the model into a semi-empirical for crop height inversion. The suitability of applying the RVoG-B three-component model for crop height inversion at the early stage in corn fields was assessed using Multi-temporal C-band PolSAR RADARSAT-2 data in three polarimetric channels. The results show that the HV channel exhibits superior potential in inverting the height of corn compared with the HH and the VV channels. The results of corn height inversion demonstrate that the RVoG-B three-component semi-empirical model performs effectively in estimating corn height, with its inversion accuracy having an RMSE ranging from 11.66cm to 24.51cm. This study demonstrates the potential application of the RVoG-B three-component semi-empirical model for inverting crop height at the early stage dominated by double-bounce scattering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".