MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Semi-automated approach towards efficient HD Maps generation and verification with Lanelet2 formats

2024· article· en· W4396830020 on OpenAlexaff
Yi-Feng Chang, Yen-En Huang, Meng-Lun Tsai, Hatem Darweesh, Kai-Wei Chiang, Mengchi Ai, Naser El‐Sheimy

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. HD Maps (High-Definition Maps) serve as crucial resources for the domain of autonomous vehicle. Because HD Maps can provide detailed and accurate road information, the generation of HD Maps has been a labour-intensive and high cost. This research presents an innovative and semi-automated approach for efficient HD Maps generation by using assure mapping tool with deep learning techniques and mobile laser scanned point cloud geometry. The proposed method starts with data collection from various sources such as images, LiDAR point clouds, and integrated INS/GNSS trajectory data. These data are labelled by using a pre-trained model. After finishing post-labelling, these data are subjected to deep learning training by using VoxelNet and Yolact++ framework and leading to the generation of an AI model. The tool effectively recognizes and categorizes features such as road surface markings, traffic signs, and traffic lights, which can be further expanded as per requirements. Finally, the output format can be converted to OpenDRIVE, Lanelet2, and other else. Hence, the extracted lane lines can compare to the manual mapping data for verifying the accuracy. This study demonstrates that the proposed approach can be instrumental in streamlining the HD Maps generation procedure, reducing manual labour, and enhancing efficiency. The assure mapping tool proves to be an effective instrument, particularly when powered by deep learning algorithms and point cloud geometries, in the creation of reliable, comprehensive, and application-ready HD Maps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesSame topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207