MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396830108 · doi:10.1055/s-0044-1786815

Identification of a Novel Intronic Mutation in VMA21 Associated with a Classical Form of X-Linked Myopathy with Autophagy

2024· article· en· W4396830108 on OpenAlexaff
Mainak Bardhan, Kiran Polavarapu, Dipti Baskar, Veeramani Preethish‐Kumar, Seena Vengalil, Saraswati Nashi, Dinesh C Sharma, Karthik Kulanthaivelu, B. N. Nandeesh, Atchayaram Nalini

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Medical Genetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyopathyMuscle biopsyMutationCongenital myopathyPathologyEosinophilicAutophagyWeaknessMedicineGeneticsBiologyBiopsyGeneAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction VMA21 -related myopathy is one of the rare forms of slowly progressive myopathy observed in males. Till now, there have been only a handful of reports, mainly from Europe and America, and two reports from India. Method Here, we describe a case of genetically confirmed VMA21 -associated myopathy with clinical, histopathological, and imaging features with a list of known VMA21 mutations. Results A 29-year-old man had the onset of symptoms at 18 years of age with features of proximal lower limb weakness. Muscle magnetic resonance imaging showed the preferential involvement of vasti and adductor magnus. A biopsy of the left quadriceps femoris showed features of autophagic vacuolar myopathy with vacuoles containing granular eosinophilic materials. In targeted next-generation sequencing, hemizygous mutation in the 3′ splice site of intron 2 of the VMA21 gene (c.164–7 T > A) was identified and confirmed the diagnosis of X-linked myopathy with excessive autophagy. Conclusion This report expands the phenotypic and genotypic profile of VMA21 -related myopathy, with a yet unreported mutation in India.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Medical GeneticsSame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207