MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396835007 · doi:10.7759/cureus.60107

Bloom Syndrome Complicated by Low-Grade Lymphoma and Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report

2024· article· en· W4396835007 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Nathan J. Gould, Emma Holjak, Jalal Barat, Keng Yeow Tay, A. Rashid Dar

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsVictoria HospitalLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
FundersLondon Health Sciences Centre
KeywordsLung cancerMedicineCancerLymphomaOncologyInternal medicineCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bloom syndrome (BS) is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder characterized by photosensitivity, rashes on the nose and cheeks, short stature, and a predisposition to develop cancers. In this report, we discuss the diagnosis and management of a 34-year-old Canadian male BS patient, originally from Honduras, who developed B-cell lymphoma and a subsequent non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Given the radiosensitivity of the patient due to his BS diagnosis and the early stage of the low-grade B-cell lymphoma, we relied on surveillance as the clinical approach to his management. The treatment for NSCLC was initiated in stage III of the disease and was palliative in intent. Chemotherapy (12 rounds of paclitaxel, with the dosage gradually increasing from 48 mg to 58 mg and finally to 72 mg) was employed to shrink the left upper lobe (LUL) lung mass. Subsequently, radiotherapy (3000 cGY in 20 fractions) was administered to improve symptoms further. The radiotherapy dose schedule was modified given the patient's BS diagnosis to avoid excessive toxicity. The palliative treatment course was well tolerated by the patient and resulted in symptom relief. However, his cancer progressed over the course of the treatment, ultimately resulting in his death 18 months after the initial diagnosis of NSCLC; no autopsy was performed. We believe this report will spur clinicians to engage in fruitful discussions about tailoring chemotherapy and radiation therapy regimens for treating cancer in BS patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0060.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207