Dramatic art/theatre in Québec’s Compulsory Education: New Perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present text refers to the situation of arts teaching in Quebec schools, highlighting the genesis of dramatic art as a school discipline. In this context, the process of an artistic intervention realized in primary classes and focused on « animated reading » is described. The objective of our research project is to determine the effects of such a pedagogical action on the level of self-determination of students (theory defined by Deci and Ryan), on attitudes (Rosenberg et Hovland) and on the progression of knowledge related to competence - 2 The interpretation of the dramatic sequences stipulated in the Quebec School Training Program (Ministry of Education, Recreation and Sport of Québec - MELS, 2001), this article dealing specifically with the results related to the aforementioned competence. The conclusions formulated on the basis of this field experience, carried out simultaneously as a Master's student and an invited artist in the school, offer us the opportunity both to enrich the school program in dramatic art/theatre and to perpetuate the respective discipline in Québec and abroad .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".