MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396852108 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c01524

Substitutional Cu Doping at Ca and Nb Sites in Ba<sub>3</sub>CaNb<sub>2</sub>O<sub>9</sub> Toward Improved Photoactivity–A First-Principles HSE06 Study

2024· article· en· W4396852108 on OpenAlexafffund
Sankha Ghosh, John Garcia, Bhavadharini Selvakumar, Amanda Ndubuisi, Karthik Shankar, Venkataraman Thangadurai, Dennis R. Salahub

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDopingMaterials scienceOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seeking tenable and sustainable alternatives for clean energy harvesting, artificial photosynthesis has emerged as a realm of research. We have investigated the effects of Cu doping at Ca and Nb sites in Ba 3 CaNb 2 O 9 (BCN) on magneto-optoelectronic properties through Density Functional Theory studies, employing the HSE06 hybrid functional to guide rational syntheses. Our calculations show that while Cu replacement of a Ca atom requires lower formation energy than replacing an Nb atom, oxygen vacancies (O V ) gradually reduce this to a large extent within the thermodynamic formability window when placed at the nearest O site, promoting Nb replacement. Cu doping at the Nb site substantially narrows the band gap, inducing the absorption of visible photons as the dopant concentration increases, while the placement of O V at CuO 6 causes gradual blue shifts. Cu doping induces weak electron polaron formation in the CuO 6 unit due to net spin polarization in Cu d states, while the placement of the O V annihilates it, albeit without reducing the oxidation state of Cu due to strong charge delocalization. Cu doping at the Nb site significantly improves the optical activity vis-à-vis pure BCN in the visible light region, especially ∼2–3 eV, resulting in promising candidates for photoelectrochemical catalysts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicElectronic and Structural Properties of OxidesFrench-language works237,207