MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Accurate, Low-Parameter and Deployable ML Architecture for Next Location Prediction

2023· article· en· W4396853544 on OpenAlexaff
Calvin Jary, Nafıseh Kahani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHyperparameterEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionFactor (programming language)ArchitectureGraphics processing unitQuality of serviceEfficient energy useReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceParallel computingComputer networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Next location prediction is a discipline that involves predicting a user's next location. Its applications include resource allocation, quality of service, energy efficiency, and traffic man-agement. This paper proposes an energy-efficient, small, and low-parameter machine learning (ML) architecture for accurate next location prediction, deployable on modest base stations and edge devices. To accomplish this we ran a hundred hyperparameter experiments on the full human mobility patterns of an entire city, to determine an exact ML architecture that reached a plateau of accuracy with the least amount of model parameters. We successfully achieved a reduction in the number of model parameters within published ML architectures from 202 million down to 2 million. This reduced the total size of the model parameters from 791 MB down to 8 MB. Additionally, this decreased the training time by a factor of four, the amount of graphics processing unit (GPU) memory needed for training by a factor of twenty, and the overall accuracy was increased from 80.16% to 82.54%. This improvement allows for modest base stations and edge devices which do not have a large amount of memory or storage, to deploy and utilize the proposed ML architecture for next location prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisFrench-language works237,207