MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396857337 · doi:10.1029/2024jc021291

Thank You to Our 2023 Peer Reviewers

2024· article· en· W4396857337 on OpenAlexaff
Lisa M. Beal, Léon Chafik, Sarah E. Fawcett, M.M. Flexas, Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs, C. Gnanaseelan, Nathalie F. Goodkin, Zouhair Lachkar, Yuanlong Li, Ryan P. Mulligan, Takeyoshi Nagai, Joanne O’Callaghan, Hannah E. Power, Karina von Schuckmann, Christopher R. Sherwood, Arvind Singh, Lars Umlauf, Martin Vancoppenolle, Anna Wåhlin, Fanghua Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Oceans · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeer reviewPsychologyComputer sciencePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Thank you to the 1396 reviewers who provided 2328 reviews during 2023 to ensure the quality and integrity of JGR‐Oceans manuscripts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.205
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.205
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0140.006
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1670.277

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.251
GPT teacher head0.546
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research OceansSame topicAcademic Publishing and Open AccessFrench-language works237,207