Renewable energy adoption and CO2 emissions in G7 economies: In-depth analysis of economic prosperity and trade relations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the relationships between economic, environmental, and trade factors within the G7 economies from 1990 to 2022, focusing on their impacts on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Analyzing data from G7 economies such as Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The study employs multiple regression (MLR) models to examine the influence of economic and environmental factors on CO2 emissions. Additionally, factor loading analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) is utilized to validate construct reliability and visualize complex relationships. The findings highlight positive correlations between GDP growth and employment, alongside negative correlations with income inequality. In addition, environmental challenges are evident through negative correlations with industrial and energy-related CO2 emissions. The practical implications highlight the importance for policymakers to prioritize strategies promoting economic growth, addressing income inequality, and fostering sustainable trade relationships within the G7 economies to ensure inclusive and sustainable development. This study contributes to the literature by offering comprehensive insights into the intricate dynamics between economic, environmental, and trade factors and their impacts on CO2 emissions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".