MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396860342 · doi:10.5802/ojmo.27

Cardinality-constrained structured data-fitting problems

2024· article· en· W4396860342 on OpenAlex
Zhenan Fan, Fang Huang, Michael P. Friedlander

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Journal of Mathematical Optimization · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardinality (data modeling)Dual (grammatical number)Iterated functionMathematical optimizationConstraint (computer-aided design)Computer scienceSimple (philosophy)AlgorithmIdentification (biology)MathematicsData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A memory-efficient solution framework is proposed for the cardinality-constrained structured data-fitting problem. Dual-based atom-identification rules reveal the structure of the optimal primal solution from near-optimal dual solutions, which allows for a simple and computationally efficient algorithm that translates any feasible dual solution into a primal solution satisfying the cardinality constraint. Rigorous guarantees bound the quality of a near-optimal primal solution given any dual-based method that generates dual iterates converging to an optimal dual solution. Numerical experiments on real-world datasets support the analysis and demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it