MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396870631 · doi:10.59490/coastlab.2024.809

Large-Scale Laboratory Experiments On The Wave Generation Due To The Collapse Of Partially And Fully Submerged Granular Columns

2024· article· en· W4396870631 on OpenAlexaff
Erica Treflik-Body, Elisabeth Steel, W. Andy Take, Ryan P. Mulligan

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on the Application of Physical Modelling in Coastal and Port Engineering and Science. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEarthquake and Tsunami Effects
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale (ratio)MechanicsGranular materialGeologyGeotechnical engineeringMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Landslides that occur in coastal environments can drive cascading consequences such as wave forces, flooding, and infrastructure damage to coastal communities. It can be difficult to classify these slides as subaerial or submarine, and the mechanics of wave generation associated with partially submerged failures are not well understood. Limited physical modelling has been conducted that encompasses both the triggering of granular landslides and subsequent waves associated with partially and fully submerged mass movements. To date, laboratory work investigating tsunamis generated by submarine landslides has focused on the wave formed in the direction of the mass movement (seaward direction) for rigid block experiments (eg. Rzadkiewicz, 1997) and deformable slide masses (e.g. Grilli et al., 2017, Takabatake, 2020, Bullard et al., 2023). From these experimental data sets, predictive relationships connecting slide acceleration, mass, and initial submergence depth to the amplitude of the wave formed have been presented for the seaward wave. Such relationships have not been presented for the landward directed wave, which propagates in the opposite direction of the submarine landslide motion. Further, not all landslides are easily classified as either subaerial or submarine. Consider the 2018 Anak Krakatoa landslide in which the sliding surface was estimated to be 100 m below sea level (Pakoksung et al., 2020), resulting in one third of the total collapse being submerged. In comparison to the end-member conditions of subaerial and submarine failures, the mechanics of wave generation associated with partially submerged failures is much less clear. Granular column collapse experiments provide an idealized experimental framework to explore momentum transfer processes and the resulting waves generated in partially submerged and fully submerged conditions. Work by Cabrera et al., (2020) made use of granular collapse experiments of partially to fully submerged columns to derive a continuous momentum-based function to estimate the maximum seaward wave amplitude based on the initial column submergence ratio (Hw/Ho). However, these experiments were conducted at a small-scale (Ho = 0.15 m) with a width of one particle (2.4 mm diameter). To address this research gap, a series of 22 large-scale granular collapse experiments were conducted by releasing columns of river stone (0.75 m and 0.50 m high) into a laboratory flume reservoir with water depths ranging up to 1.10 m to explore the wave generation and runup processes in both seaward and landward directions. The columns were released by a rapid pneumatically actuated vertical rising gate designed to enable the near instantaneous loss of support of the source volumes resulting in granular collapse. The failure mechanics were captured with high-speed cameras (Figure 1a,b) and wave amplitudes were measured using wave capacitance gauges (Figure 1c,d). This work also provides the first experimental data set of the landward propagating wave and runup associated with submerged granular collapse experiments. Overall, the seaward wave amplitudes measured in these highly-instrumented, large-scale physical models agree with empirical relationships developed in a previous study using smaller-scale models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... International Conference on the Application of Physical Modelling in Coastal and Port Engineering and Science.Same topicEarthquake and Tsunami EffectsFrench-language works237,207