Safe Control for Soft-Rigid Robots with Self-Contact Using Control Barrier Functions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Incorporating both flexible and rigid components in robot designs offers a unique solution to the limitations of traditional rigid robotics by enabling both compliance and strength. This paper explores the challenges and solutions for controlling soft-rigid hybrid robots, particularly addressing the issue of self-contact. Conventional control methods prioritize precise state tracking, inadvertently increasing the system's overall stiffness, which is not always desirable in interactions with the environment or within the robot itself. To address this, we investigate the application of Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) and High Order CBFs to manage self-contact scenarios in serially connected soft-rigid hybrid robots. Through an analysis based on Piecewise Constant Curvature (PCC) kinematics, we establish CBFs within a classical control framework for self-contact dynamics. Our methodology is rigorously evaluated in both simulation environments and physical hardware systems. The findings demonstrate that our proposed control strategy effectively regulates self-contact in soft-rigid hybrid robotic systems, marking a significant advancement in the field of robotics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it