MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396878016 · doi:10.1109/taes.2024.3400177

Fixed-Time Practical Antisaturation Attitude Tracking Control of QUAV With Prescribed Performance: Theory and Experiments

2024· article· en· W4396878016 on OpenAlexaff
Peng Jin, Qian Ma, Jason Gu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Attitude controlSaturation (graph theory)Radar trackerTracking (education)Control (management)Computer scienceEngineeringControl engineeringMathematicsRadarArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the fixed-time attitude tracking control problem for quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle by considering actuator saturation and prescribed performance constraint. First, hyperbolic tangent function is used to deal with actuator saturation. Furthermore, by analyzing the relationship between the tracking error and the transient performance constraints, the prescribed performance function is designed to constrain the transient performance of tracking error. Then, a fixed-time tracking controller is addressed by the backstepping method and fuzzy logic systems, where it does not need the prior precise information of systems model. Theoretically, the stability of the closed-loop system is validated by Lyapunov stability theory. Finally, the hardware-in-the-loop test results validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic SystemsSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207