MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396879358 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v10i6.2703

Foot Pressure Monitoring By Physiological Parameters And Early Detection Of Pvd

2023· article· en· W4396879358 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A Dhivya, S Jeevitha, P Swetha, S Yuvasri, Dr.Yuvaraj V

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoot (prosody)PhotoplethysmogramComputer sciencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineRisk analysis (engineering)Wireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In today's demanding lifestyles, prolonged standing and sudden movements often lead to fatigue, affecting individuals, especially athletes, who rely on optimal foot performance. Additionally, conditions like Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) pose significant health risks, necessitating early detection for effective management. To address these concerns, we propose integrating foot pressure monitoring technology with physiological parameters such as heart rate, blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), and temperature. This holistic approach aims to develop a comprehensive monitoring system capable of early PVD detection. By embedding a GSM Module with a MAX30102 sensor into footwear, real-time foot pressure distribution can be monitored, providing insights into gait abnormalities and potential circulatory issues. Concurrently, monitoring physiological parameters offers additional indicators of vascular health and perfusion. This integrated system offers a proactive approach to foot health monitoring, empowering individuals, particularly athletes, to optimize performance and mitigate health risks associated with conditions like PVD. Early detection through this system can lead to timely interventions, enhancing overall well-being and quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207