Quad-Optimized Low-Discrepancy Sequences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The convergence of Monte Carlo integration is given by the uniformity of samples as well as the regularity of the integrand. Despite much effort dedicated to producing excellent, extremely uniform, sampling patterns, the Sobol’ sampler remains unchallenged in production rendering systems. This is not only due to its reasonable quality, but also because it allows for integration in (almost) arbitrary dimension, with arbitrary sample count, while actually producing sequences thus allowing for progressive rendering, with fast sample generation and small memory footprint. We improve over Sobol’ sequences in terms of sample uniformity in consecutive 2-d and 4-d projections, while providing similar practical benefits – sequences, high dimensionality, speed and compactness. We base our contribution on a base-3 Sobol’ construction, involving a search over irreducible polynomials and generator matrices, that produce (1, 4)-sequences or (2,4)-sequences in all consecutive quadruplets of dimensions, and (0, 2)-sequence in all consecutive pairs of dimensions. We provide these polynomials and matrices that may be used as a replacement of Joe & Kuo’s widely used ones, with computational overhead, for moderate-dimensional problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".