Parallel maximal common subgraphs with labels for molecular biology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Advances in graph algorithmics have allowed in-depth study of many natural objects from molecular biology or chemistry to social networks. Particularly in molecular biology and cheminformatics, understanding complex structures by identifying conserved sub-structures is a key milestone towards the artificial design of novel components with specific functions. Given a dataset of structures, we are interested in identifying all maximum common connected partial subgraphs between each pair of graphs, a task notoriously NP-Hard. In this work, we present parallel algorithms over shared and distributed memory to enumerate all maximal connected common sub-graphs between pairs of arbitrary multi-directed graphs with labels on their edges. We offer an implementation of these methods and evaluate their performance on the non-redundant dataset of all known RNA 3D structures. We show that we can compute the exact results in a reasonable time for each pairwise comparison while taking into account a much more diverse set of interactions—resulting in much denser graphs—resulting in an order of magnitude more conserved modules. All code is available at https://gitlab.info.uqam.ca/cbe/pasigraph and results in the branch results .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".