MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396885250 · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2024.103066

Protocol to perform integrative analysis of high-dimensional single-cell multimodal data using an interpretable deep learning technique

2024· article· en· W4396885250 on OpenAlexafffund
Manqi Zhou, Hao Zhang, Zilong Bai, Dylan Mann‐Krzisnik, Fei Wang, Yue Li

Bibliographic record

VenueSTAR Protocols · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence InstituteMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceProtocol (science)Leverage (statistics)PreprocessorOmicsDeep learningArtificial intelligenceData pre-processingImputation (statistics)Machine learningData miningComputational biologyBioinformaticsMissing dataBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advent of single-cell multi-omics sequencing technology makes it possible for researchers to leverage multiple modalities for individual cells. Here, we present a protocol to perform integrative analysis of high-dimensional single-cell multimodal data using an interpretable deep learning technique called moETM. We describe steps for data preprocessing, multi-omics integration, inclusion of prior pathway knowledge, and cross-omics imputation. As a demonstration, we used the single-cell multi-omics data collected from bone marrow mononuclear cells (GSE194122) as in our original study. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Zhou et al.1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSTAR ProtocolsSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207