MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396892510 · doi:10.1145/3651598

Topology-aware Parallel Joins

2024· article· en· W4396892510 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ACM on Management of Data · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoinsJoin (topology)SkewCartesian productNetwork topologyComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Extension topologyProduct topologyComputationLogical topologyTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsGeneral topologyCombinatoricsComputer networkTopological space

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the design and analysis of parallel join algorithms in a topology-aware computational model. In this model, the network is modeled as a directed graph, where each edge is associated with a cost function that depends on the data transferred between the two endpoints and the link bandwidth. The computation proceeds in synchronous rounds and the cost of each round is measured as the maximum cost over all the edges in the network. Our main result is an asymptotically optimal join algorithm over symmetric tree topologies. The algorithm generalizes prior topology-aware protocols for set intersection and cartesian product to a binary join over an arbitrary input distribution with possible data skew.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0070.006
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it