Metis - A Python-Based User Interface to Collect Expert Feedback for GenerativeChemistry Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current de novo drug design models face one crucial challenge: a disparity between the user’s expectations and the actual output of the model in practical applications. Tailoring models to better align with chemists’ preferences is key to overcoming this obstacle effectively. While interest in preference-based and human-in-the-loop machine learning in chemistry is continuously increasing, no tool currently exists that enables the collection of standardized and chemistry-specific feedback. Metis is a Python-based open-source graphical user interface (GUI), designed to solve this and enable the collection of chemists’ detailed feedback on molecular structures. The GUI enables chemists to explore and evaluate molecules, offering a user-friendly interface for annotating preferences and specifying desired or undesired structural features. By providing chemists the opportunity to give detailed feedback, allows researchers to capture more efficiently the chemist’s implicit knowledge and preferences. This knowledge is crucial to align the chemist’s idea with the de novo design agents. The GUI aims to enhance this collaboration between the human and the "machine" by providing an intuitive platform where chemists can interactively provide feedback on molecular structures, aiding in preference learning and refining de novo design strategies. Metis integrates with the existing de novo framework REINVENT, creating a closed-loop system where human expertise can continuously inform and refine the generative models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.114 | 0.039 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".