MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396895054 · doi:10.4324/9781003372738-7

Working in Offshore Schools

2024· book-chapter· en· W4396895054 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fei Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubmarine pipelineMarine engineeringGeologyOceanographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The multifocal context of offshore schools may offer opportunities for cultural exchange and learning, but working in offshore schools cannot be reduced to the sole problematic of cultural shock. In a metaphoric sense, one has to be prepared for the good, the bad, and the odd. The chapter is based on a case study that explored the perceptions and stories of Canadian inspectors, principals, and teachers and the ways they reflect on their work experiences in offshore schools. Offshore schools offer a unique space of glocalization where two cultures and systems run in parallel. They converge when teachers and principals work together for the betterment of students but diverge when differing views and philosophies of education lead to tensions and frictions regarding curriculum, pedagogy, and the operation of the schools. Such divergence in ideology and worldviews towards education inevitably poses challenges for stakeholders who are deeply involved in the offshore school system. Hence, offshore schools become a site where the good, the bad, and the odd are powerfully entangled in ways distinctive of offshore schools, generating multifaceted sociopolitical, economic, and cultural dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducation Systems and PolicyFrench-language works237,207