Ocular rosacea: The often‐overlooked component of rosacea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ocular rosacea is a chronic inflammatory condition that affects the eyes and periocular skin as part of the broader cutaneous rosacea skin disease. Cutaneous rosacea is common, affecting approximately 5.5% of the global population, where up to 72% of patients will develop ocular involvement either before or after the cutaneous disease. Clinical features of ocular rosacea include Meibomian gland disease, blepharitis and conjunctivitis. Ocular rosacea reduces quality of life through various potential mechanisms including anxiety, social withdrawal and physical discomfort. If left untreated, ocular rosacea can reduce visual acuity and in severe cases, vision loss. Several topical and systemic treatment options are available, with efficacies based on their anti‐inflammatory properties. This review focuses on the clinical features of ocular rosacea, differential diagnoses and treatment options with the aim of aiding clinicians involved in the care of rosacea patients to better identify onset of the ocular manifestations of rosacea and prevent its severe complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".