MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396915482 · doi:10.1117/12.2692522

Near eye 3D display with concave pin mirror based on bionic compound-eye

2024· article· en· W4396915482 on OpenAlex
Mao Fan, Binghua Wu, Zong-hao Hou, Ji-gao Wang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Imaging Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer visionStereo displayComputer graphics (images)Lens (geology)Human eyeCompound eyeArtificial intelligenceField of view3d printedOpticsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Augmented Reality (AR) is a new raising technology, it has great impacts of our future lives. To be well suited for practical use, the device must be small in volume, light in weight, cheap to manufacture and able to project a 3D image with a large field of view (FOV). We demonstrate the near eye 3D display based on the pin-mirror and bionic compound-eye. The bionic compound-eye composed by micro-lens array combined with a micro-display is employed to firstly reconstruct 3D real image, then 3D real image is projected onto the concave pin-mirror, finally reflected and displayed the 3D virtual image into human eye. The whole system is achieved with light weight, cheap cost, comfortable display with a FOV of 88 degrees . In the future this technology could be used for the Metaverse and remote surgeries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Imaging TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207