MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396918193 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2024.3401144

Spectrum Prediction for Mobile Internet of Things Based on a DB-LSTM Algorithm

2024· article· en· W4396918193 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceInternet of ThingsAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fast advancement of 5G mobile communications, artificial intelligence and big data technology has driven the development of the Internet of Things (IoT), while at the same time putting great pressure on existing spectrum resources. Spectrum prediction, as a technology to improve spectrum utilization, faces problems such as poor modeling and ineffective use of historical spectrum sensing data. In addition, the different transmission environments and geographical locations of IoT devices lead to complex and variable wireless mobile channels, which are susceptible to interference from noise and external environments. They lead to inaccurate spectrum sensing results, which can affect the accuracy of spectrum prediction. Therefore, employing long short term memory (LSTM) and bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM) neural networks proposes a dual branch neural network mobile spectrum prediction model (DB-LSTM). The historical sensing data under variable channels are fully utilized to extract forward and backward temporal feature information to overcome the effect of variable environment. First, spectrum sensing using a residual network (ResNet) module and convolutional neural network (CNN) is proposed to extract intrinsic features of signal data and improve the accuracy of spectrum sensing results. This data is employed to train the DB-LSTM model and make for spectrum prediction. The <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">M</i> / <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">G</i> /1 queuing-based model under <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">N</i> -Nakagami channel is used to simulate and generate the signal data set under 2FSK and QPSK modulation methods. The proposed DB-LSTM method is evaluated from three perspectives of accuracy, Error and mean square error (MSE). The results obtained show that compared to the Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN), Transformer, and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformer (BERT) models, the spectrum prediction accuracy is improved by 2%, 10%, and 1% respectively, the Error is reduced by 29%, 53%, and 4%, respectively, and the MSE is reduced by 23%, 65%, and 4%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it