MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396919061 · doi:10.1145/3659593

AeroSense: Sensing Aerosol Emissions from Indoor Human Activities

2024· article· en· W4396919061 on OpenAlexaff
Bhawana Chhaglani, Camellia Zakaria, Richard E. Peltier, Jeremy Gummeson, Prashant Shenoy

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfection Control and Ventilation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversitas Brawijaya
KeywordsAerosolEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The types of human activities occupants are engaged in within indoor spaces significantly contribute to the spread of airborne diseases through emitting aerosol particles. Today, ubiquitous computing technologies can inform users of common atmosphere pollutants for indoor air quality. However, they remain uninformed of the rate of aerosol generated directly from human respiratory activities, a fundamental parameter impacting the risk of airborne transmission. In this paper, we present AeroSense, a novel privacy-preserving approach using audio sensing to accurately predict the rate of aerosol generated from detecting the kinds of human respiratory activities and determining the loudness of these activities. Our system adopts a privacy-first as a key design choice; thus, it only extracts audio features that cannot be reconstructed into human audible signals using two omnidirectional microphone arrays. We employ a combination of binary classifiers using the Random Forest algorithm to detect simultaneous occurrences of activities with an average recall of 85%. It determines the level of all detected activities by estimating the distance between the microphone and the activity source. This level estimation technique yields an average of 7.74% error. Additionally, we developed a lightweight mask detection classifier to detect mask-wearing, which yields a recall score of 75%. These intermediary outputs are critical predictors needed for AeroSense to estimate the amounts of aerosol generated from an active human source. Our model to predict aerosol is a Random Forest regression model, which yields 2.34 MSE and 0.73 r2 value. We demonstrate the accuracy of AeroSense by validating our results in a cleanroom setup and using advanced microbiological technology. We present results on the efficacy of AeroSense in natural settings through controlled and in-the-wild experiments. The ability to estimate aerosol emissions from detected human activities is part of a more extensive indoor air system integration, which can capture the rate of aerosol dissipation and inform users of airborne transmission risks in real time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous TechnologiesSame topicInfection Control and VentilationFrench-language works237,207