Pharmaco- and ozone therapy in outpatient medical rehabilitation programs for patients with chronic cerebral ischemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Purpose of the study. To evaluate the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation of patients with stage 1 chronic cerebral ischemia using ozone therapy in an outpatient setting. Material and methods. A randomized, prospective, single-center, open-label, controlled study was conducted on 80 patients with stage 1 chronic cerebral ischemia, who were divided into 2 groups by means of simple randomization: in the study group (SG/41 patients), the patients received rehabilitation in accordance with the federal clinical guidelines and intravenous ozone therapy; in the control group (CG/39 patients), the patients underwent only standardized treatment. The effectiveness of rehabilitation measures was monitored using validated rating scales, electroencephalography, and quality of life assessment. Results. The implementation of the medical rehabilitation program for patients with stage 1 chronic cerebral ischemia in an outpatient setting provides a significant reduction in pain (p < 0.01), correction of psycho-emotional and cognitive disorders (p < 0.01), normalization of lipid metabolism (p < 0.01), and improvement in quality of life (p < 0.01). The efficacy of the developed outpatient medical rehabilitation program for patients with stage 1 chronic cerebral ischemia was 85.4 %, and that of the standardized program — 77.0 %. Conclusion. Integrated pharmacotherapy and ozone therapy provide a significant increase in the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation of patients with chronic cerebral ischemia at the outpatient stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".