MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396929123 · doi:10.1007/s11548-024-03126-x

Shape completion in the dark: completing vertebrae morphology from 3D ultrasound

2024· article· en· W4396929123 on OpenAlex
Miruna-Alexandra Gafencu, Yordanka Velikova, Mahdi Saleh, Tamás Ungi, Nassir Navab, Thomas Wendler, Mohammad Farid Azampour

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersTechnische Universität München
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePoint cloudProcess (computing)Deep learningGround truthComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Ultrasound (US) imaging, while advantageous for its radiation-free nature, is challenging to interpret due to only partially visible organs and a lack of complete 3D information. While performing US-based diagnosis or investigation, medical professionals therefore create a mental map of the 3D anatomy. In this work, we aim to replicate this process and enhance the visual representation of anatomical structures. METHODS: We introduce a point cloud-based probabilistic deep learning (DL) method to complete occluded anatomical structures through 3D shape completion and choose US-based spine examinations as our application. To enable training, we generate synthetic 3D representations of partially occluded spinal views by mimicking US physics and accounting for inherent artifacts. RESULTS: The proposed model performs consistently on synthetic and patient data, with mean and median differences of 2.02 and 0.03 in Chamfer Distance (CD), respectively. Our ablation study demonstrates the importance of US physics-based data generation, reflected in the large mean and median difference of 11.8 CD and 9.55 CD, respectively. Additionally, we demonstrate that anatomical landmarks, such as the spinous process (with reconstruction CD of 4.73) and the facet joints (mean distance to ground truth (GT) of 4.96 mm), are preserved in the 3D completion. CONCLUSION: Our work establishes the feasibility of 3D shape completion for lumbar vertebrae, ensuring the preservation of level-wise characteristics and successful generalization from synthetic to real data. The incorporation of US physics contributes to more accurate patient data completions. Notably, our method preserves essential anatomical landmarks and reconstructs crucial injections sites at their correct locations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it