Quantification and Visualization of CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Ischemia-Causing Coronary Arteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) has poor specificity to identify coronary stenosis that limit blood flow to the myocardial tissue. Integration of dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) can potentially improve the diagnostic accuracy. We propose a method that integrates cCTA and CT-MPI to identify culprit coronary lesions that limit blood flow to the myocardium. Coronary arteries and left ventricle surfaces were segmented from cCTA and registered to CT-MPI. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was derived from CT-MPI. A ray-casting approach was developed to project volumetric MBF onto the left ventricle surface. MBF volume were divided into coronary-specific territories based on proximity to the nearest coronary artery. MBF and normalized MBF were computed for the entire myocardium and each of the coronary artery. Projection of MBF onto cCTA allowed for direct visualization of perfusion defects. Normalized MBF had higher correlation with ischemic myocardial territory compared to MBF (MBF: R2=0.81 and Index MBF: R2=0.90). There were 18 vessels that showed angiographic disease (stenosis >50%); however, normalized MBF demonstrated only 5 coronary territories to be ischemic. These findings demonstrate that cCTA and CT-MPI can be integrated to visualize myocardial defects and detect culprit coronary arteries responsible for perfusion defects. These methods can allow for non-invasive detection of ischemia-causing coronary lesions and ultimately help guide clinicians to deliver more targeted coronary interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".