MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396947278 · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-51352-9

Improving the sustainability and effectiveness of photovoltaic evaporative cooling greenhouse in the Sahel

2024· article· en· W4396947278 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Alio Sanda M. Djibrilla, Rabani Adamou, Karimoun M. Illyassou, Atto H. Abdoulkader, Dramé Yayé Aissétou

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGreenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWest African Science Service Centre on Climate Change and Adapted Land UseAgence Universitaire de la Francophonie
KeywordsEvaporative coolerEnvironmental scienceMicroclimateGreenhouseRelative humidityGreenhouse gasPhotovoltaic systemAtmospheric sciencesRefrigerantHumidityMeteorologyEnvironmental engineeringEcologyHeat exchangerMechanical engineeringGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anthropogenic climate change has caused worldwide extreme weather events including droughts, floods and heatwaves. It disproportionately affects developing countries through food insecurity. Greenhouse is important and relevant to the food-energy-water security in many regions. This study investigates the thermal behavior of photovoltaic evaporative cooling greenhouse made with eco-friendly coolers. The cooling potential of local plant materials was assessed under ambient conditions. Experimental thermal data obtained from optimized evaporative cooling system equipped with Hyphaene thebaica fibers (HF-pad) and conventional Celdek pad (C-pad), were used in heat and mass transfer equations to derive the greenhouse cooling performances. Computational fluid dynamics analysis software was used to investigate the refrigerant fluid distribution in the greenhouse. Cooler using HF-pad allows to keep the microclimate below 25 °C, with maximum moisture rate up to 80%, under harsh ambient conditions (temperature: 30-45 °C, humidity: 10-15%). HF-pad had the highest cooling coefficient of performance (COP = 9 against 6 for C-pad), the best cost to efficiency ratio (CER = 5; 4 times less than C-pad) and the lowest outlet temperature (20.0 °C). Due to higher outlet air velocity (1.116 m/s against 0.825 m/s for HF-pad), C-pad cooler spread cool air (20.5 °C) up to 1.25 m farther than its counterpart, creating higher pressure in the atmosphere (1.42 Pa against 0.71 Pa), with 2 times turbulent kinetic energy (0.014 J/kg). HF-pad presented cooling performances that compete with conventional pads. Moreover, optimization of HF-pad frame engineering and the technology scaling up to industrial level can allow better thermal and economic performances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicGreenhouse Technology and Climate ControlFrench-language works237,207