MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Induced Offset Voltage Sensor for Separable Wear-Out Mechanism Characterization in a 12nm FinFET Process

2024· article· en· W4396949342 on OpenAlexafffund
Ian E. J. Hill, Mateo Rendón, A. Ivanov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTransistorVoltageThreshold voltageOffset (computer science)Electronic engineeringChipProcess (computing)Degradation (telecommunications)Stress (linguistics)Process windowNanometreMaterials scienceComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasingly detailed predictive modelling and monitoring of semiconductor wear-out benefits greatly from on-chip measurement of transistor degradation under different voltage stress regimes. To this end, we present a novel sensor architecture leveraging direct current (DC) readout for product designs where precise timing sources are unavailable. Our design avoids wear-out in ancillary transistors and compensates for process, voltage, and temperature variations to ensure measurements track induced shifts in threshold voltage under a configurable stress regime in isolation. The proposed architecture is described in detail and a review of existing DC sensors for monitoring semiconductor degradation is included to enable comparative analysis of our design. Sensor functionality is validated via implementation in a 12nm FinFET process. Accelerated wear-out testing is conducted via a custom automated test system. Experimental results demonstrate that the design is capable of separately monitoring transistor degradation under different stress regimes and highlight observed wear-out behaviours in nanometre-scale transistors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207