MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4396951311 · doi:10.1101/2024.05.15.24307434

Determinants of HIV infection among pregnant women in Cameroon: A contribution toward the elimination of vertical transmission in low- and middle-income countries

2024· preprint· en· W4396951311 on OpenAlexaff
Justin Ndié, Jean Pierre Yves Awono Noah, Francis Atéba Ndongo, Joseph Fokam, Alice Ketchaji, Rogacien Kana Dongmo, Christian Noël Bayiha, Richard Tchapda, Tatiana Avang Nkoa Palisson, Martial Gaël Bonyohe, Caroline Teh Monteh, Njamsnhi Yembe Wepnyu, Félicité Naah Tabala, Hernandez Lélé Siaka, Carelle Djofang Yepndo, Audrey Raïssa Djomo Nzaddi, Maurice Rocher Mbella, Marie Micheline Dongmo, Gildas Nguemkam, Ngo Issouck, Nelly Monkam, Leopoldine Madjo Oumbe, Clifford Moluh, Paul Tjek, Vittorio Colizzi, Carlo Federico Perno, Giulia Cappelli, Nicaise Ndembi, David Kob, Gregory Halle‐Ekane, Basile Keugoung, Alexis Ndjolo, Serge Clotaire Billong, Céline Nguefeu Nkenfou, Jérôme Ateudjieu, Anne Cécile Zoung-Kanyi Bissek

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for International Peace and Security
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Transmission (telecommunications)Low and middle income countriesDeveloping countryObstetricsEconomicsMedicineVirologyEconomic growthEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The risk of HIV transmission during antenatal care (ANC) in Cameroon remains a concern. According to recent studies, the prevalence of HIV in the country is around 4.5%, which increases the likelihood of vertical transmission. Objective To identify the determinants of HIV infection among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics (ANC) in Cameroon and to estimate HIV seroprevalence. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among ANC attendees aged ≥15 years from September 2022 to June 2023 in 324 health facilities in 08 regions of Cameroon (Adamaoua, Yaounde, East, Far-North, Douala, North, West, South). Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected using questionnaire. HIV screening was performed according to the national algorithm. Estimates of HIV seroprevalence and identification of its determinants using multivariable logistic regression (95% CI) were performed with Excel and SPSS 22 software. Results Overall, 10674 pregnant women were enrolled, with median [IQR] age 25 years [21– 30]; 40.0% at a secondary educational level; 44.1% married monogamously; 46.3% multiparous; 38.8% in the second quarter of pregnancy and 16.5% reporting at least one abortion. Overall HIV seroprevalence was 2.6% [95%CI: 2.33; 2.93]. Significantly higher prevalence was found with the regions of Adamaoua (aOR 3.78 [95%CI: 1.87-7.67], p<0.001), East (9.38 [5.6-15.67], p<0.001), North (3.07 [1.74-5.42], p<0.001), South (2.93 [1.66-5.16]; p<0.001); lack of education (2.08 [1.06-4.06], p=0.032), primary education (2.44 [1.32-4.50], p=0.004) and secondary education (2.29 [1.28-4.08], p=0.005) were significantly associated with HIV infection, while monogamous marriage (0.33 [0.22-0.51], p<0.001), the absence of abortion (0.59 [0.37-0.98], p=0.036) and large multiparous (0.38 [0.17-0.82]; p=0.015) were protective. Conclusion Despite the overall low-prevalence among pregnant women at national-level, several factors are associated with HIV in ANC, the absence or low-level of education, being elderly (>30 years), singleness, history of abortion and low parity predicted the HIV status during ANC. Thus, public health interventions towards these at-risk target groups will help to reduce new infections among pregnant women, hence contributing to achieve eMTCT in Cameroon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions→French-language works237,207→