MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396955267 · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000010274

Histopathologic Predictors for Locoregional Recurrence in Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma – A Single-Center Retrospective Study

2024· article· en· W4396955267 on OpenAlexaff
Satnam Singh Jolly, Vidya Rattan, Lingesh Parasuraman, Suvradeep Mitra, Apoorva Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Craniofacial Surgery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerineural invasionMedicineLymphovascular invasionStage (stratigraphy)Retrospective cohort studyBasal cellT-stageResection marginSingle CenterMedical recordSurgical marginDemographicsCarcinomaInternal medicineCancerOncologySurgeryResectionMetastasis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is known for its aggressive behavior and the high potential for locoregional recurrence (LRR), contributing to poor prognostic outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of histologic parameters in predicting LRR in patients with OSCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 58 OSCC patients treated between January 2018 and December 2022. Data were collected from medical records, focusing on demographics, clinicopathologic features, and treatment details. Different histopathologic factors such as depth of invasion, tumor stage (T), pathologic node stage (N), histologic grade of differentiation, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, extranodal extension (ENE), and margin of resection were correlated with LRR. RESULTS: Out of 58 patients, 20 (34.4%) reported LRR within the first year of follow-up. In the recurrence group, 14 patients succumbed to death within 24 months. Among all the histopathologic parameters, our study found a statistically significant correlation between higher pathologic node stage, presence of ENE, and closest margin of resection (≤5 mm) with LRR. CONCLUSION: Higher pathologic node stage, presence of ENE, and closest margin of resection (≤5 mm) were the histopathologic factors associated with LRR, and can serve as deciding prognostic factors. Treatment intensification in early-stage disease with higher pathologic nodal stage, presence of ENE, and closest margin of resection (≤5 mm) may improve survival outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Craniofacial SurgerySame topicHead and Neck Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207