<i>Haitian Revolutionary Fictions: An Anthology,</i> edited by Marlene L. Daut, Grégory Pierrot, and Marion C. Rohrleitner
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Haitian Revolution's impact on the print culture of the Atlantic World has proved to be fertile ground for literary history and analysis in recent years.This work belongs to a multidisciplinary body of scholarship-from literary studies and history, to law, political theory, and anthropology, among others-that has sought to reevaluate the Haitian Revolution and its inheritance and to contest its prior denigration, silencing, and disavowal.It is thus entirely in keeping with the ongoing boom in Haitian Revolution studies that the field now boasts its own literary anthology, and a fine one at that.The editors of Haitian Revolutionary Fictions: An Anthology have, with an abundance of skill and care, excerpted, translated, assembled, and anthologized into a single volume a cornucopia of literary writings generated by the Haitian Revolution of 1791-1804, that spectacular corner of Black diasporic history that stands as a foundational moment in the making of the modern world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".