MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396966282 · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3989-4

Research in Computational Molecular Biology

2024· book· en· W4396966282 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLecture notes in computer science · 2024
Typebook
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of California, Los AngelesStockholms UniversitetFreie Universität BerlinUniversität BielefeldGenome Institute of SingaporeCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueTel Aviv UniversityTsinghua UniversityNational Science FoundationBar-Ilan UniversityRice UniversityNational University of SingaporeCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterUniversity of Central FloridaUniversità degli Studi di PadovaUniversity of WashingtonPrinceton UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonBrown UniversityHelsingin YliopistoUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversity of TorontoYale UniversitySeoul National UniversityBroad InstituteIndiana University BloomingtonNational Institutes of HealthGeorgia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of HaifaCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaShanghaiTech UniversityWestlake UniversityUniversity of ConnecticutUniversity of Southern California
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLecture notes in computer scienceSame topicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207