MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396982470 · doi:10.1109/tac.2024.3401970

Distributed Control Under Transmission Delays: A Model-Based Hybrid System Approach

2024· article· en· W4396982470 on OpenAlexafffund
Mani H. Dhullipalla, Hao Yu, Tongwen Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceControl (management)Transmission (telecommunications)Control systemDistributed computingControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Networked systems, in practice, suffer from several network-induced imperfections. In this article, we consider the problem of distributed control of nonlinear multiagent systems (MASs) where the information broadcasts over a network are susceptible to one such imperfection, namely, transmission delays. The design methodology employed is such that the sampling instants (at which agents broadcast information) could be both aperiodic and asynchronous in nature. The broadcasts, upon arrival, are propagated by the agents through dynamical models and these propagates are used in their control protocols. The overall MAS is formulated as a hybrid dynamical system whose stability governs the upper bounds on: first, the sampling interval, namely, the duration between two consecutive broadcasts, and second, the transmission delays that the broadcasts might be prone to. Finally, through a case study on the consensus of Lipschitz nonlinear agents, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207