MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396989308 · doi:10.1681/asn.20223311s1260c

Abnormal Menstruation and Female Reproductive Hormones in Kidney Failure

2022· article· en· W4396989308 on OpenAlexaffabout
Danica H. Chang, Sofia B. Ahmed, Erin A. Brennand, Shannon M. Ruzycki, Sandra M. Dumanski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMenstruationHormonePhysiologyMedicineKidneyGonadal Steroid HormonesEndocrinologyInternal medicineGynecologyBiologySteroid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Kidney failure disrupts the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, resulting in reproductive hormone abnormalities. It is not fully understood if these disturbances impact menstruation in females living with kidney failure treated with dialysis. Therefore, this study aimed to (1) describe menstruation and changes in menstrual patterns with chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, and (2) assess associations between reproductive hormones and menstrual pattens among females with kidney failure. Methods: Females aged 18-50 years were recruited from dialysis clinics around Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Using a self-administered survey, demographic, kidney health, and menstrual health histories were recorded. Blood samples were collected to measure follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, prolactin, sex hormone binding globulin, and anti-Müllerian hormone levels. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed as appropriate. Results: Twenty-seven females [n=23 hemodialysis (age 36 (IQR: 31,44) years), n=4 peritoneal dialysis (age 38 (IQR: 30,45) years)], largely identifying as white cisgender women were included. In the hemodialysis group, 52% reported absent menstrual bleeding during dialysis, though only 17% reported this during CKD and 9% before CKD diagnosis (P=0.01); however, there was no difference in proportions across timepoints in the peritoneal dialysis group (25% each) (P=0.92). In the hemodialysis group, 48% described heavy menstrual bleeding during dialysis; this proportion did not differ during CKD (65%) and before CKD diagnosis (70%) (P=0.20). Among participants on peritoneal dialysis, 25% described heavy menstrual bleeding during dialysis, which did not significantly differ during CKD (25%) and before CKD diagnosis (50%) (P=0.91). All the hormone levels did not differ between those with absent and present menstrual bleeding during dialysis, nor did it differ between those with heavy and normal menstrual bleeding. Conclusions: Among females with dialysis-dependent kidney failure, proportions of absent and heavy menstrual bleeding were high. No associations between reproductive hormone levels and menstrual status were observed, underscoring the uncertainty around how kidney disease affects female reproductive health. Funding: Government Support - Non-U.S.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207