Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Rescue Therapy in Pediatric Bupropion Cardiotoxicity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective Our objective was to describe clinical characteristics and course of pediatric bupropion ingestions requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) life support. Desgin The study included a retrospective cohort of patients ≤18 years of age reported to a regional poison control (PC) system covering three states in the upper Midwest United States. All bupropion exposures ≤18 years of age, coded as receiving ECMO to treat toxicity, were included. Clinical presentation and management including ECMO are presented as descriptive statistics. Results During the study period, 4,951 bupropion exposures were reported; 1,145 (23.1%) were children. Nine patients were coded as undergoing ECMO; four (44.4%) were ≤18 years of age (median 16, range 14–17). All were treated with venoarterial ECMO. The median time from ingestion to presentation was 2.25 hours (range: 1–3.5). Median first systolic blood pressure and pulse were 100 mm Hg (range: 70–124) and 119.5 (range: 70–175). The median time from ingestion to ECMO was 17.63 hours (range: 7.25–33.75); median number of vasopressors was 2.5 (range: 2–3). All experienced multiple seizures, ventricular dysrhythmias, and hypotension. Three of four sustained cardiac arrest. All but one required transfer to an ECMO-capable facility for definitive care. Three patients survived with full neurologic recovery; one died. Conclusion Pediatric bupropion cases requiring ECMO were rare in this study. Time to initiation and duration of EMCO suggest that the variable onset of hemodynamic instability may delay ECMO initiation. It is incumbent on PCs and medical toxicologists to educate prescribers and pediatricians about bupropion's potential lethality and to consider early transfer to an ECMO center.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".