MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396994005 · doi:10.1681/asn.20213210s1186c

Estimating Long-Term Survival Rates in Patients with Anaemia of Non-Dialysis-Dependent CKD: An Expert Elicitation

2021· article· en· W4396994005 on OpenAlexaff
Juan José García Sánchez, Johannes Nicolaas Martinus Ouwens, B. J. A. Willigers, Andrew Briggs, Oliver Darlington, Purav R. Bhatt, Eric Wittbrodt, Marvin Sinsakul, Susan Grandy, Hiddo J.L. Heerspink, Carol A. Pollock, Roberto Pecoits‐Filho, Navdeep Tangri, Csaba P. Kövesdy, David C. Wheeler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDialysisTerm (time)Intensive care medicineKidney diseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Clinical trials for the treatment of anemia of CKD provide mortality data. Cost-effectiveness analyses of new treatments require survival extrapolations over a lifetime time horizon. An expert elicitation was conducted to obtain estimates of long-term survival probabilities for patients with anemia of non-dialysis dependent (NDD) CKD. Methods: Literature searches were used to identify clinical trials and observational studies that included patients with anemia of NDD CKD aged ≥ 18 years, that had > 500 participants per study arm and that reported all-cause death incidence and/or survival Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. Study data were extracted and collated. KM curves were extrapolated to 20 years by calculating standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) compared to age- and sex-adjusted general population lifetables. A summary of relevant data was presented to six CKD experts. After an elicitation training, the experts made a judgment on the 10th, 50th and 90th percentile of 10- and 20-year survival of patients with anemia of NDD CKD. The individual judgments were combined into an overall assessment. Results: From the literature, all-cause death incidence in patients with anemia of NDD CKD was 3.5-39.4 per 100 patient-years (five studies). From SMR-extrapolated KM curves, estimated survival at 10 and 20 years was 30-57% and < 1-13%, respectively (three studies; median age of 80 and 68 years in two studies, and mean age of 66 in the third). The aggregated elicited survival values were 50% (80% confidence interval [CI]: 34-64%) at 10 years and 21% (80% CI: 8-36%) at 20 years. Conclusions: The elicited survival estimates could be used to model long-term survival and complement results from other extrapolation methods to inform and validate cost-effectiveness analyses. Long-term survival extrapolations are also likely to support patients and physicians with treatment decisions. Funding: Commercial Support - AstraZeneca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.158
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.286
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.836

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1580.286
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0090.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicErythropoietin and Anemia TreatmentFrench-language works237,207