MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396995634 · doi:10.1681/asn.20203110s1819c

Outcomes of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Recommended Doses in Treating Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in Critically Ill Patients Using Renal Replacement Therapy

2020· article· en· W4396995634 on OpenAlexaff
Wasim S. El Nekidy, Leen Oyoun Alsoud, Nizar Attallah, Laila Rkieh, Fadi Hijazi, Ahmad Nusair, Jihad Mallat, Islam M. Ghazi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Tract Infections Management
Canadian institutionsTrillium Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCritically illRenal replacement therapyMedicineIntensive care medicineTazobactamGram-negative bacterial infectionsMicrobiologyAntibioticsBiologyAntibiotic resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Ceftolozane/tazobactam (CEF/TAZ) is a new broad spectrumn cephalosporin effective against Multi-drug Resistant (MDR) bacteria. The clinical outcomes of the recommended dose of CEF/TAZ in patients utilizing renal replacement therapies are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and microbilogical efficacy of CEF/TAZ in treating MDR in pateints utlizing continous venovenous hemofiltraion (CVVH) and intermittent hemodialsyis (IHD). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at our quaternary care hospital between May 2015 and December 2019. We reviewed all hospitalized adults who had MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa or MDR enterobacteriaceae treated with CEF/TAZ while utilizing CVVH or IHD Results: We identified 11 patients who met the inclusion criteria with a mean age of 63.0 ± 17.8 years and a mean weight of 63.8±15.7 kg. All patients were critically ill, needed mechanical ventilation, and used vasopressors. All 11 patients had pneumonia, one of them developed secondary bacteremia and two had decubitus ulcer. Nine patients had MDR pseudomonas aeruginosa while two had MDR E. coli and Klebsiella Pneumonia. Six patients were on IHD, while the remaining 5 patients were on CVVH. The most commonly used dose for CVVH was 450 or 750 mg intravenous (IV) every 8 hours (only one received 1500 mg at the same frequency). For IHD, the common dose was 450 mg IV every 8 hours. Of the 7 pateints who had repeated cultures, three had microbiological cure and four had clinical cure. Two pateints expired within 30 days and 3 more expired within 90 days. Two of the patients who had clinical cure, had recurrence within 4 weeks. Conclusions: The efficacy of the recommended CEF/TAZ dose in patients utilizing RRT is uncertain. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies are urgently needed to determine the adequacy of CEF/AVI dosing in this population

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicUrinary Tract Infections ManagementFrench-language works237,207